 |
Ben Warner's Blog
Job Opening: Planning Council
|
Position Announcement: Evaluation Associate The Planning Council has an opening for an Evaluation Associate position. The Evaluation Associate will be responsible for working on evaluations of health and human services programs and research related to community issues in Southeastern Wisconsin. The Planning Council is a non-profit organization that serves as an independent resource for information, education, research, and consulting on community issues.
Required Education and Experience Education – Masters Degree or other advanced degree required. Program evaluation experience – graduate level training and/or relevant work experience in program evaluation. Community experience – past experience working with non-profit or governmental agencies, diverse community groups, and/or consumers of health or human services. Required Skills Listening skills – actively attends to and conveys understanding of the comments and questions of others; listens well in a group. Analytical skills – gathers relevant information systematically; understands complexities and perceives relationships among problems or issues; accurately uses logic and interpretation in analyses; understands limitations of research approaches and methods. Written communication skills – conveys information clearly and effectively; summarizes qualitative and quantitative data accurately and objectively, with attention given to the intended audience. Oral communication skills – speaks clearly and expresses self well in groups and one-on-one. Values diversity – shows respect and appreciation for diversity. Interpersonal skills – sets appropriate personal and interpersonal boundaries; ability to be flexible. Capacity for teamwork – works well both independently and within a team approach to project management. Demonstrated Knowledge Evaluation – familiarity with traditional program evaluation methods and emerging trends in evaluation; awareness of and/or experience with community-based research; familiarity with data collection instruments and procedures; familiarity with evaluator role and ethics; understanding of the function and use of program evaluation within non-profit agencies; understanding of the role of evaluation in federally funded programs (e.g., SAMHSA). Data analysis –experience with quantitative and qualitative data analysis and data interpretation. Computer software – proficient with the application of computer programs for data entry and data analysis (e.g., Excel, Access, SPSS). Human services – experience in mental health and/or substance abuse fields highly preferred. Please submit resume, cover letter, salary requirements, and references by May 15th, 2008 to: Janet DeJesus, Office Manager Planning Council for Health and Human Services, Inc., 1442 N. Farwell Ave., Suite 300, Milwaukee, WI 53202 jdejesus [at] planningcouncil [dot] org
|
|
| April 30, 2008 | 10:04 AM |
|
|
 |
Child Abuse and Data Transparency
|
A new report by First Star and the Children's Advocacy Institute at the University of San Diego's School of Law calls for better data standards and more openness in reporting child abuse and child deaths in the United States. The report, State Secrecy and Child Deaths in the U.S. (PDF), says that " The majority of U.S. states fail to release adequate information about fatal and life-threatening child abuse cases, adhering to misguided and secretive policies that place confidentiality above the welfare of children and prevent public scrutiny that would lead to systemic reforms ..."USA Today reports that what the groups are after is "maximum transparency." The report caught my eye, and not just for the rankings of all 50 states in compliance with data reporting standards. It reminded me that a key role we play in compiling and disseminating community indicators reports is advocating for better and more open data reporting. I know we get involved in this work because we want to change the community, and understand that the democracy of data creates shared knowledge, better decisions, and stronger actions. But we're also in the field to make sure that good data is available for everyone, and sometimes we fall short in ensuring that potential data providers understand the importance of sharing their information with the larger community.
What has been your experience in encouraging better data? How do you measure your efforts in improving the information available for your community, above and beyond reporting the information already available?
|
|
|
|
 |
CIC Innovation Awards
|
For the third year, CIC will be celebrating promising indicator practics with its Innovation Awards. Tell us about your project and how it has benefitted and brought change in your community, or nominate a project you feel meets the criteria. International projects are welcome. Go to www.communityindicators.net to learn more about the Awards and how to enter. Deadline for entries is 12 May 2008.
HIGHLIGHTING PROMISING PRACTICES THE COMMUNITY INDICATORS CONSORTIUM INNOVATION AWARDS 2008
“When an outside entity…recognizes your work, it elevates the value of that product locally” Donna Sines, Executive Director, Community Vision, Osceola County, FL, Third Place Winner 2007
For the third year in a row, we are delighted to invite you to apply for the Community Indicators Consortium’s (CIC) Innovation Awards Applications are due Monday, May 12, 2008.
We are seeking nominations of indicator projects (US or international) that best demonstrate positive change in their communities and the power of indicators to drive that change. The communities will likely be geographically contiguous areas, but they might be topical communities.
The purpose of the Awards is
As before, we anticipate first, second, and third place awards and a selective number of nominations will be recognized as honorable mentions. The three winners and the honorable mentions will add to the body of knowledge about promising practices in the world of indicators. The winners will be invited to speak at our Annual Conference in Arlington, VA, on June 26 – 28, 2008, and their web links will be put on our website. The more CIC can share the good news and celebrate success, the more we can help you, and practitioners and community leaders like you, to create real change and real benefit to your communities. “CIC provides a forum…we were able to learn from like-minded professionals and share Baltimore’s story of data-driven management” Christ Thomaskutty, Deputy Mayor, Baltimore CitiStat, Second Place Winner 2007 CRITERIA AND QUALIFICATIONS Projects can be hosted by non-profit organizations, local government entities, or academic institutions. They will publish, electronically or in hard-copy, data-based indicators on community conditions for the purposes of better understanding conditions of concern and improving those conditions. Your community may be large or it may be small, but your impact will be significant.
We are interested in:
- Specific changes caused by the projects
- The tools and mechanisms used to catalyze action and drive community change
HOW TO APPLY Applications are due Monday, May 12, 2008 1—A one-paragraph summary describing the nature of your project, the actual or forthcoming changes in the community that can be ascribed to the project, and the mechanisms through which change came about. Please include the name of the project, the sponsoring organization, contact name with phone number and e-mail address, name of the community your project covers, the project web site or published report, and the size of your organization (staff plus volunteers) 2—A short narrative (maximum three pages) describing the project in greater detail, including background and scope, what changes have occurred, and how you created/fostered these changes. For example: - Why and when was your project created, what need brought it into being
- How wide-spread is its current and future impact
- What are/were your goals
- The size of the community your project seeks to influence
- Who benefits, directly and indirectly
- Specifically, what changes have occurred as a result of your work
- How did you do it
- What tools and methods have you employed
- What have you learned, and what can we learn from you
3—Provide the names, with contact information, of at least three individuals who are not paid project staff who would be willing to speak about the strength, value, and influence of your project. THE EVALUATION PROCESS
1—All applications will be reviewed by at least three experts in the field of indicators. Choices will be made based on the projects’ meeting of the criteria. A panel of seven experts will be chosen by CIC.
2—Experts will independently rank the selected projects and then they will discuss their individual choices to reach consensus on the top ten projects.
3—The experts will conduct telephone interviews with the non-staff people you identify as knowing about the strength and influence of the project.
TIMELINE Finalists will be notified by Friday, May 23, 2008. Winners will be notified by Friday, June 10, 2008. Winners will be invited to attend the Sixth Annual CIC Conference in Arlington, VA, on June 26 – 28, 2008, to speak about their projects and to receive their awards. Visit our web site, http://www.communityindicators.net/ , for more information about the Conference.
SEND YOUR APPLICATION TO:
Lynda Fairbanks Atkins Interim Executive Director Lfairbanks-atkins@comcast.net
Or
Community Indicators Consortium Post Office Box 8222 Lynn, MA 01904
Electronic submission is preferred
|
|
AGA Adds New Blog
|
The Advancing Government Accountability group -- http://www.agacgfm.org/homepage.aspx -- has added a new feature to their website. Here's the news: AGA's blog is a new feature on our AGA website (www.agacgfm.org ) that uses a variety of guest "speakers" to set the stage for the day's topic. Tomorrow I will be writing about performance reporting and some of the ways government entities have used their performance reports in decision making and citizen communication. I would appreciate your comments and observations not only to stimulate a good discussion but also to share best practices with those reading the blog.The first set of articles are quite strong. Check it out!
|
|
|
|
 |
In Praise of GDP
|
We've been talking about the need for broader indicators of progress than the Gross Domestic Product, and that need has launched an international summit and a new presidential commission in France. Turns out, however, that some folks like the GDP just fine, thank you very much, and don't want it meddled with. Justin Fox opines in TIME magazine: ...[C]ompiling a reliable measure of all the economic activity in a country as big as this one is hard. Which is something to consider whenever you hear somebody arguing that GDP ought to be shelved in favor of some more holistic measure of economic well-being. Somebody like, say, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who early this year appointed a high-powered task force--boasting not just one but two economics Nobelists, Amartya Sen and Joseph Stiglitz--to devise a GDP replacement. Similar "ditch-GDP" noises can be heard frequently from enlightened sorts who care a lot about the environment, health care, education and happiness.
Now, there certainly are measures of economic and societal success that we ought to pay more attention to. But ditch GDP? Perish the thought. One reason the GDP is getting a lot more love lately comes from the work by Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers where they show a positive correlation between GDP and happiness. From The New York Times report:
“The central message,” Ms. Stevenson said, “is that income does matter.”
To see what they mean, take a look at the map that accompanies this column. It’s based on Gallup polls done around the world, and it clearly shows that life satisfaction is highest in the richest countries. The residents of these countries seem to understand that they have it pretty good, whether or not they own an iPod Touch.
If anything, Ms. Stevenson and Mr. Wolfers say, absolute income seems to matter more than relative income. In the United States, about 90 percent of people in households making at least $250,000 a year called themselves “very happy” in a recent Gallup Poll. In households with income below $30,000, only 42 percent of people gave that answer.
Here's the chart they reference:

What are your reactions?
|
|
| April 18, 2008 | 11:04 AM |
|
Latest Posts
Monthly Archive
Change Language
Tags Archive
callforpapers childrensindicators community communityindicators conferences data datadisplaytools datasources display economicindicators educationindicators employmentopportunity governmentperformancemeasures healthindicators indicatorblogs indicators indicatorshumor mapping measuringhappiness neighborhoodindicators poverty qualityoflife reportreleases socialindicators socialnetworks sources storytelling sustainability tools triplebottomline
Friends
Links
66601 views
|
 |